What principle governs the ethical use of mechanical restraints?

The principle of necessity governs the ethical use of mechanical restraints. This principle asserts that restraints should only be employed when absolutely necessary to prevent harm, either to the individual being restrained or to others. The use of mechanical restraints must be justified by a demonstrable need, ensuring that less restrictive alternatives have been considered and deemed inadequate. This focus on necessity encourages care providers to evaluate the situation thoroughly and prioritize the safety and well-being of all individuals involved.

By adhering to this principle, practitioners are reminded of the moral obligation to use restraints only in situations where their application is essential for safety. This ensures that mechanical restraints are not used arbitrarily or excessively, thereby supporting ethical standards in care and intervention practices. The principle of necessity also emphasizes the importance of regular review and documentation of restraint usage, fostering accountability and promoting humane treatment.